Rain Intelligence · Public Preview
Book a Demo

California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act

California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act Litigation Trends

GeneratedAug 7, 2026

40 predicted defendants identified in Rain Intelligence for this trend — companies that have not yet been sued, but are on plaintiffs’ firms’ radar.

Request a Demo

Filings

0

Cases already on the docket

Under investigation

0

Names locked

AI forecasts

0

Likely next defendants — full list in product

Total predictions

0

Investigations + forecasts

Premium Intelligence

0 predicted defendants are not in this preview

Rain Intelligence customers see the full list of companies under pre-filing investigation by plaintiffs’ firms — plus the AI-forecasted defendants most likely to be sued next, with case theories, evidence summaries, and plaintiff-firm activity. This public preview shows only what is already on the docket.

0

Pre-filing investigations

0

AI forecasts

Understanding the trend

What is this trend?

The Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, California Civil Code § 1747.08, restricts merchants from requesting or recording personal identification information during a credit-card transaction when that information is not needed to complete the purchase. Current records show a concentrated wave of California filings and plaintiff-firm investigations focused on phone numbers, email addresses, ZIP codes, and other customer data collected at checkout.

What caused it

The current wave follows a repeatable retail practice: store personnel or online checkout flows ask for identifying information while processing a card purchase, then retain or use it for marketing, loyalty enrollment, receipts, or profiling. Recent matters cite the statute and the California Supreme Court’s Pineda decision as the foundation for per-transaction statutory exposure.

Practices driving the lawsuits

  • Requesting and recording phone numbers, email addresses, ZIP codes, or addresses at in-store checkout
  • Using transaction-linked personal information for marketing, targeted advertising, or customer profiling
  • Conditioning completion of a card purchase or access to a receipt or loyalty benefit on nonessential information
  • Collecting the same information during online card transactions where it is not needed for payment or delivery

Filed cases

Public court records · filterable + sortable

14 of 14 filings·40 hiddenBook a Demo
FiledDefendantCourtFirmIndustryTheoryComplaint
Jul 2, 2026

BYLT, LLC

Anthony Kassas v. BYLT, LLC

Los Angeles County Superior Court CaliforniaLYNCH CARPENTER, LLPTechnology and digital platforms
Section 1747.08+3
View
Jul 1, 2026

Foot Locker Retail, Inc.

Chelsea Garland and George Gutierrez v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc.

San Diego County CaliforniaLynch Carpenter, LLPConsumer products and retail
Section 1747.08+3
View
Apr 23, 2026

Groupe Dynamite Inc.

Veronica Cabrera v. Groupe Dynamite Inc.

Superior Court of California County of Los AngelesLYNCH CARPENTER, LLPConsumer products and retail
Section 1747.08+2
View
Apr 20, 2026

Hot Topic, Inc.

Dara Peloquin v. Hot Topic, Inc.

Sonoma County CaliforniaLYNCH CARPENTER, LLPConsumer products and retail
Section 1747.08+2
View
Mar 23, 2026

Zumiez Inc.

Matthew Gonzales v. Zumiez Inc.

Fresno County CaliforniaLynch Carpenter, LLPConsumer products and retail
Section 1747.08+3
View
Mar 22, 2026

ALO, LLC

Eri Noguchi v. ALO, LLC

Superior Court of California County of Los AngelesLYNCH CARPENTER, LLPConsumer products and retail
Section 1747.08+3
View
Mar 22, 2026

United States of Aritzia Inc.

Jordan Nelson and Guyana Simonyan v. United States of Aritzia Inc.

Los Angeles County CaliforniaLynch Carpenter, LLPConsumer products and retail
Section 1747.08+2
View
Mar 20, 2026

Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.

Corina Pompa and Wendy Cross v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.

San Diego County CaliforniaLynch Carpenter, LLPTechnology and digital platforms
Section 1747.08+3
View
Jun 11, 2024

Alpinestars Usa, Inc.

Blake Wing And Scott Nairne V. Alpinestars Usa, Inc.

Superior Court of the State of CaliforniaMilberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLCConsumer products & retail
Section 1747.08+3
View
May 15, 2024

Vuori, Inc., and Does 1

Evan Sawyer v. Vuori, Inc.

Missouri Western District CourtMilberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLCConsumer products & retail
Section 1747.08+2
View
May 15, 2024

Lamps Plus, Inc.

John Hopton v. Lamps Plus, Inc.

Missouri Western District CourtMilberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLCConsumer products & retail
Section 1747.08+3
View
May 15, 2024

Shiekh Shoes, LLC

Laura McGauley-Fisher v. Shiekh Shoes, LLC

Superior Court CaliforniaWucetich & Korovilas LLPConsumer products and retail
Section 1747.08+3
View
May 15, 2024

Jetpens, and Does

Willie Monroe v. JetPens

Superior Court of CaliforniaMilberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLCConsumer products & retail
Section 1747.08+3
View
Aug 15, 2023

J. Crew Group, LLC

Courtney Champagne, Polina Ioffe, and Stassa Mark v. J. Crew Group, LLC

New York Southern District CourtNot identifiedApparel & specialty retail
Section 1747.08+2
View
Want to see who’s next?

0 predicted defendants are waiting in Rain Intelligence.

Be the first attorney to reach the next client in this trend. Rain Intelligence customers get the full list of investigations, AI-forecasted targets, and plaintiff-firm activity — delivered to their inbox before complaints are filed.

30+

AmLaw 200 firms

$200M+

Attorney fees generated

0

Enterprise cancellations