California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act
California’s Song-Beverly Credit Card Act Litigation Trends
40 predicted defendants identified in Rain Intelligence for this trend — companies that have not yet been sued, but are on plaintiffs’ firms’ radar.
Request a DemoFilings
0
Cases already on the docket
Under investigation
0
Names locked
AI forecasts
0
Likely next defendants — full list in product
Total predictions
0
Investigations + forecasts
Premium Intelligence
0 predicted defendants are not in this preview
Rain Intelligence customers see the full list of companies under pre-filing investigation by plaintiffs’ firms — plus the AI-forecasted defendants most likely to be sued next, with case theories, evidence summaries, and plaintiff-firm activity. This public preview shows only what is already on the docket.
0
Pre-filing investigations
0
AI forecasts
Understanding the trend
What is this trend?
The Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, California Civil Code § 1747.08, restricts merchants from requesting or recording personal identification information during a credit-card transaction when that information is not needed to complete the purchase. Current records show a concentrated wave of California filings and plaintiff-firm investigations focused on phone numbers, email addresses, ZIP codes, and other customer data collected at checkout.
What caused it
The current wave follows a repeatable retail practice: store personnel or online checkout flows ask for identifying information while processing a card purchase, then retain or use it for marketing, loyalty enrollment, receipts, or profiling. Recent matters cite the statute and the California Supreme Court’s Pineda decision as the foundation for per-transaction statutory exposure.
Practices driving the lawsuits
- Requesting and recording phone numbers, email addresses, ZIP codes, or addresses at in-store checkout
- Using transaction-linked personal information for marketing, targeted advertising, or customer profiling
- Conditioning completion of a card purchase or access to a receipt or loyalty benefit on nonessential information
- Collecting the same information during online card transactions where it is not needed for payment or delivery
Filed cases
Public court records · filterable + sortable
| Filed▼ | Defendant | Court | Firm | Industry | Theory | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2026 | BYLT, LLC Anthony Kassas v. BYLT, LLC | Los Angeles County Superior Court California | LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP | Technology and digital platforms | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| Jul 1, 2026 | Foot Locker Retail, Inc. Chelsea Garland and George Gutierrez v. Foot Locker Retail, Inc. | San Diego County California | Lynch Carpenter, LLP | Consumer products and retail | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| Apr 23, 2026 | Groupe Dynamite Inc. Veronica Cabrera v. Groupe Dynamite Inc. | Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles | LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP | Consumer products and retail | Section 1747.08+2 | View |
| Apr 20, 2026 | Hot Topic, Inc. Dara Peloquin v. Hot Topic, Inc. | Sonoma County California | LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP | Consumer products and retail | Section 1747.08+2 | View |
| Mar 23, 2026 | Zumiez Inc. Matthew Gonzales v. Zumiez Inc. | Fresno County California | Lynch Carpenter, LLP | Consumer products and retail | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| Mar 22, 2026 | ALO, LLC Eri Noguchi v. ALO, LLC | Superior Court of California County of Los Angeles | LYNCH CARPENTER, LLP | Consumer products and retail | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| Mar 22, 2026 | United States of Aritzia Inc. Jordan Nelson and Guyana Simonyan v. United States of Aritzia Inc. | Los Angeles County California | Lynch Carpenter, LLP | Consumer products and retail | Section 1747.08+2 | View |
| Mar 20, 2026 | Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. Corina Pompa and Wendy Cross v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc. | San Diego County California | Lynch Carpenter, LLP | Technology and digital platforms | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| Jun 11, 2024 | Alpinestars Usa, Inc. Blake Wing And Scott Nairne V. Alpinestars Usa, Inc. | Superior Court of the State of California | Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC | Consumer products & retail | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| May 15, 2024 | Vuori, Inc., and Does 1 Evan Sawyer v. Vuori, Inc. | Missouri Western District Court | Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC | Consumer products & retail | Section 1747.08+2 | View |
| May 15, 2024 | Lamps Plus, Inc. John Hopton v. Lamps Plus, Inc. | Missouri Western District Court | Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman, PLLC | Consumer products & retail | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| May 15, 2024 | Shiekh Shoes, LLC Laura McGauley-Fisher v. Shiekh Shoes, LLC | Superior Court California | Wucetich & Korovilas LLP | Consumer products and retail | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| May 15, 2024 | Jetpens, and Does Willie Monroe v. JetPens | Superior Court of California | Milberg Coleman Bryson Phillips Grossman PLLC | Consumer products & retail | Section 1747.08+3 | View |
| Aug 15, 2023 | J. Crew Group, LLC Courtney Champagne, Polina Ioffe, and Stassa Mark v. J. Crew Group, LLC | New York Southern District Court | Not identified | Apparel & specialty retail | Section 1747.08+2 | View |
0 predicted defendants are waiting in Rain Intelligence.
Be the first attorney to reach the next client in this trend. Rain Intelligence customers get the full list of investigations, AI-forecasted targets, and plaintiff-firm activity — delivered to their inbox before complaints are filed.
30+
AmLaw 200 firms
$200M+
Attorney fees generated
0
Enterprise cancellations