Allulose 0 Sugar Litigation Trends
Allulose 0 Sugar Litigation Trends
52 predicted defendants identified in Rain Intelligence for this trend — companies that have not yet been sued, but are on plaintiffs’ firms’ radar.
Request a DemoFilings
0
Cases already on the docket
Under investigation
0
Names locked
AI forecasts
0
Likely next defendants — full list in product
Total predictions
0
Investigations + forecasts
Premium Intelligence
0 predicted defendants are not in this preview
Rain Intelligence customers see the full list of companies under pre-filing investigation by plaintiffs’ firms — plus the AI-forecasted defendants most likely to be sued next, with case theories, evidence summaries, and plaintiff-firm activity. This public preview shows only what is already on the docket.
0
Pre-filing investigations
0
AI forecasts
Understanding the trend
What is this trend?
The matters allege that products marketed as “0 Sugar,” “Zero Sugar,” or “Sugar Free” contain meaningful amounts of allulose, which plaintiffs characterize as a sugar under federal labeling rules. The cases are concentrated in packaged foods, beverages, cereal, bars, gummies, and hydration products.
What caused it
The recent filings repeatedly cite FDA nutrient-content labeling rules and the Seventh Circuit’s July 2026 Franco v. Chobani decision. Plaintiffs say the front-of-pack zero-sugar message creates a misleading net impression, supports a price premium, and is not cured by the ingredient or Nutrition Facts panel.
Practices driving the lawsuits
- Front-label “0g Sugar,” “Zero Sugar,” “Zero Added Sugar,” or “Sugar Free” claims on products containing allulose.
- Health-forward, keto, or guilt-free positioning that allegedly amplifies the zero-sugar message.
- Ingredient-panel disclosures that plaintiffs say do not reconcile with the front-label representation.
- Nationwide and state consumer-protection claims seeking restitution, damages, corrective labeling, and injunctions.
Filed cases
Public court records · filterable + sortable
| Filed▼ | Defendant | Court | Firm | Industry | Theory | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2026 | WK Kellogg Co | Northern District of California | Malk & Pogo Law Group | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+5 | View |
| Aug 26, 2026 | Gruns Nutrition, Inc. | Northern District of California | Gucovschi Law Firm · Bursor & Fisher | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+4 | View |
| Aug 26, 2026 | Gruns Nutrition, Inc. | Central District of California | Ben Travis Law | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+5 | View |
| Aug 25, 2026 | Supplying Demand, Inc. | Southern District of New York | Gucovschi Law Firm · Bursor & Fisher | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+4 | View |
| Aug 24, 2026 | WK Kellogg Co | Central District of California | Gucovschi Law Firm · Bursor & Fisher | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+4 | View |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Supplying Demand, Inc. | Northern District of California | Malk & Pogo Law Group | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+5 | View |
| Aug 24, 2026 | Linus Technology MergerSub, LLC | Northern District of California | Treehouse Law | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+5 | View |
| Aug 19, 2026 | Magic Spoon, Inc. | Southern District of New York | Gucovschi Law Firm | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+4 | View |
| Aug 18, 2026 | Magic Spoon Inc. | Northern District of Illinois | Janove PLLC and MALK & POGO LAW GROUP | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+4 | View |
| Aug 17, 2026 | Unilever United States, Inc.|The Liv Group, Inc. | Northern District of California | Janove | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+3 | View |
| Aug 12, 2026 | The LIV Group, Inc. | Northern District of California | Gucovschi Law Firm | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+4 | View |
| Aug 7, 2026 | Unilever United States|The LIV Group, Inc. | Central District of California | Malk & Pogo Law Group | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+4 | View |
| Jul 27, 2026 | Chobani, LLC | Northern District of Illinois | Unknown | Food & Beverage | Allulose-as-sugar+3 | View |
0 predicted defendants are waiting in Rain Intelligence.
Be the first attorney to reach the next client in this trend. Rain Intelligence customers get the full list of investigations, AI-forecasted targets, and plaintiff-firm activity — delivered to their inbox before complaints are filed.
30+
AmLaw 200 firms
$200M+
Attorney fees generated
0
Enterprise cancellations