Refer-a-Friend SMS Campaigns — Litigation Trend Report (Interactive)
Refer-a-Friend SMS Campaigns — Litigation Trend Report (Interactive)
105 predicted defendants identified in Rain Intelligence for this trend — companies that have not yet been sued, but are on plaintiffs’ firms’ radar.
Request a DemoFilings
0
Cases already on the docket
Under investigation
0
Names locked
AI forecasts
0
Likely next defendants — full list in product
Total predictions
0
Investigations + forecasts
Premium Intelligence
0 predicted defendants are not in this preview
Rain Intelligence customers see the full list of companies under pre-filing investigation by plaintiffs’ firms — plus the AI-forecasted defendants most likely to be sued next, with case theories, evidence summaries, and plaintiff-firm activity. This public preview shows only what is already on the docket.
0
Pre-filing investigations
0
AI forecasts
Understanding the trend
What is this trend?
Refer-a-friend (RAF) is a marketing feature where a company prompts an existing customer to invite a friend by text. The company supplies pre-composed promotional copy, a referral link, and frequently the SMS-sending infrastructure itself. When the friend has never opted in to receive marketing texts from the company, every RAF text can be a violation of the federal TCPA and — more aggressively enforced — state texting statutes such as Washington's Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA), Florida's FTSA, and California's analogs. Statutory damages run $500–$1,500 per message, so a single RAF feature touching tens of thousands of contacts can produce eight-figure class exposure.
What caused it
Two forces converged in 2023–2025. First, in Jensen v. Capital One (W.D. Wash. 2024) and follow-ons, courts repeatedly held that companies cannot hide behind a 'the user sent it, not us' defense — Washington CEMA reaches anyone who 'assists in the transmission,' and Section 230 does not preempt that liability. Second, the Robinhood RAF settlement (Moore v Robinhood) and Block / Cash App RAF settlement (Bottoms v Block, $3M+ in fees) signaled to the plaintiffs' bar that RAF cases settle for real money. Specialty firms — Bursor & Fisher, Dovel & Luner, Crosner Legal, Zimmerman Reed, Tousley Brain Stephens — now run RAF investigations at scale, scanning fintech, retail, and gig-economy apps for any feature that prompts an SMS invite.
Practices driving the lawsuits
- Pre-composing the marketing copy and link the user 'sends' to a friend.
- Auto-sending the SMS from a company-controlled short code or number rather than the user's own phone.
- Surfacing the user's phone contacts and offering a one-tap multi-send invite flow.
- Paying the inviting user a cash or credit bounty per successful referral (treats the RAF text as commercial advertising).
- Failing to verify the recipient's prior express written consent before transmitting the RAF text.
- Continuing RAF outreach after a STOP reply, or sending RAF texts during state-restricted hours.
Filed cases
Public court records · filterable + sortable
| Filed▼ | Defendant | Court | Firm | Industry | Theory | Complaint |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2026 | Kalshi Nicholas Brown v. Kalshi Inc. | Western District of Washington | Maze Law Group | Technology and digital platforms | Washington CEMA / CPA | View |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Mistplay Chris Hopkins v. Mistplay, Inc. and Mistplay USA, Inc. | Western District of Washington | Crosner Legal | Telecommunications / Media | Washington CEMA / CPA | View |
| Feb 24, 2026 | Alibaba Chris Hopkins v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Alibaba Group (U.S.) Inc., Alibaba (China) Technology Co., Limited, and Alibaba (Singapore) Limited | Western District of Washington | Crosner Legal | Telecommunications / Media | Washington CEMA / CPA | View |
| Dec 2, 2025 | Block (Cash App) Bottoms v Block Inc | Western District of Washington | Terrell Marshall Law Group | — | Washington CEMA / CPA+1 | View |
| Nov 21, 2025 | Ruff Roofing Adam Brock v. Ruff Construction, LLC d/b/a Ruff Roofing | Southern District of Texas | Shamis & Gentile | Telecommunications / Media | TCPA — Referral Texts | View |
| Jul 29, 2025 | Block (Cash App) Bottoms v Block Inc | Western District of Washington | Terrell Marshall Law Group | — | Washington CEMA / CPA+1 | View |
| Jun 17, 2025 | Chime Taft Charles v. Chime Financial, Inc. | King County Superior Court (WA) | Tousley Brain Stephens | Financial Services | Washington CEMA / CPA | View |
| Apr 21, 2025 | Interest Media Fridline v Interest Media Inc | Middle District of Pennsylvania | — | — | TCPA — Referral Texts+1 | View |
| Feb 25, 2025 | Capital One Jensen v Capital One Financial Corporation | Western District of Washington | — | — | Washington CEMA / CPA+2 | View |
| May 24, 2024 | Capital One Tamie Jensen v. Capital One Financial Corporation | Western District of Washington | Dovel & Luner | — | Washington CEMA / CPA+1 | View |
| Feb 13, 2024 | Robinhood Moore v Robinhood Financial LLC | Western District of Washington | Terrell Marshall Law Group | — | Washington CEMA / CPA+1 | View |
0 predicted defendants are waiting in Rain Intelligence.
Be the first attorney to reach the next client in this trend. Rain Intelligence customers get the full list of investigations, AI-forecasted targets, and plaintiff-firm activity — delivered to their inbox before complaints are filed.
30+
AmLaw 200 firms
$200M+
Attorney fees generated
0
Enterprise cancellations