Rain Intelligence · Public Preview
Book a Demo

Refer-a-Friend SMS Campaigns — Litigation Trend Report (Interactive)

Refer-a-Friend SMS Campaigns — Litigation Trend Report (Interactive)

GeneratedMay 11, 2026

105 predicted defendants identified in Rain Intelligence for this trend — companies that have not yet been sued, but are on plaintiffs’ firms’ radar.

Request a Demo

Filings

0

Cases already on the docket

Under investigation

0

Names locked

AI forecasts

0

Likely next defendants — full list in product

Total predictions

0

Investigations + forecasts

Premium Intelligence

0 predicted defendants are not in this preview

Rain Intelligence customers see the full list of companies under pre-filing investigation by plaintiffs’ firms — plus the AI-forecasted defendants most likely to be sued next, with case theories, evidence summaries, and plaintiff-firm activity. This public preview shows only what is already on the docket.

0

Pre-filing investigations

0

AI forecasts

Understanding the trend

What is this trend?

Refer-a-friend (RAF) is a marketing feature where a company prompts an existing customer to invite a friend by text. The company supplies pre-composed promotional copy, a referral link, and frequently the SMS-sending infrastructure itself. When the friend has never opted in to receive marketing texts from the company, every RAF text can be a violation of the federal TCPA and — more aggressively enforced — state texting statutes such as Washington's Commercial Electronic Mail Act (CEMA), Florida's FTSA, and California's analogs. Statutory damages run $500–$1,500 per message, so a single RAF feature touching tens of thousands of contacts can produce eight-figure class exposure.

What caused it

Two forces converged in 2023–2025. First, in Jensen v. Capital One (W.D. Wash. 2024) and follow-ons, courts repeatedly held that companies cannot hide behind a 'the user sent it, not us' defense — Washington CEMA reaches anyone who 'assists in the transmission,' and Section 230 does not preempt that liability. Second, the Robinhood RAF settlement (Moore v Robinhood) and Block / Cash App RAF settlement (Bottoms v Block, $3M+ in fees) signaled to the plaintiffs' bar that RAF cases settle for real money. Specialty firms — Bursor & Fisher, Dovel & Luner, Crosner Legal, Zimmerman Reed, Tousley Brain Stephens — now run RAF investigations at scale, scanning fintech, retail, and gig-economy apps for any feature that prompts an SMS invite.

Practices driving the lawsuits

  • Pre-composing the marketing copy and link the user 'sends' to a friend.
  • Auto-sending the SMS from a company-controlled short code or number rather than the user's own phone.
  • Surfacing the user's phone contacts and offering a one-tap multi-send invite flow.
  • Paying the inviting user a cash or credit bounty per successful referral (treats the RAF text as commercial advertising).
  • Failing to verify the recipient's prior express written consent before transmitting the RAF text.
  • Continuing RAF outreach after a STOP reply, or sending RAF texts during state-restricted hours.

Filed cases

Public court records · filterable + sortable

11 of 11 filings·105 hiddenBook a Demo
FiledDefendantCourtFirmIndustryTheoryComplaint
Apr 27, 2026

Kalshi

Nicholas Brown v. Kalshi Inc.

Western District of WashingtonMaze Law GroupTechnology and digital platforms
Washington CEMA / CPA
View
Feb 24, 2026

Mistplay

Chris Hopkins v. Mistplay, Inc. and Mistplay USA, Inc.

Western District of WashingtonCrosner LegalTelecommunications / Media
Washington CEMA / CPA
View
Feb 24, 2026

Alibaba

Chris Hopkins v. Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Alibaba Group (U.S.) Inc., Alibaba (China) Technology Co., Limited, and Alibaba (Singapore) Limited

Western District of WashingtonCrosner LegalTelecommunications / Media
Washington CEMA / CPA
View
Dec 2, 2025

Block (Cash App)

Bottoms v Block Inc

Western District of WashingtonTerrell Marshall Law Group
Washington CEMA / CPA+1
View
Nov 21, 2025

Ruff Roofing

Adam Brock v. Ruff Construction, LLC d/b/a Ruff Roofing

Southern District of TexasShamis & GentileTelecommunications / Media
TCPA — Referral Texts
View
Jul 29, 2025

Block (Cash App)

Bottoms v Block Inc

Western District of WashingtonTerrell Marshall Law Group
Washington CEMA / CPA+1
View
Jun 17, 2025

Chime

Taft Charles v. Chime Financial, Inc.

King County Superior Court (WA)Tousley Brain StephensFinancial Services
Washington CEMA / CPA
View
Apr 21, 2025

Interest Media

Fridline v Interest Media Inc

Middle District of Pennsylvania
TCPA — Referral Texts+1
View
Feb 25, 2025

Capital One

Jensen v Capital One Financial Corporation

Western District of Washington
Washington CEMA / CPA+2
View
May 24, 2024

Capital One

Tamie Jensen v. Capital One Financial Corporation

Western District of WashingtonDovel & Luner
Washington CEMA / CPA+1
View
Feb 13, 2024

Robinhood

Moore v Robinhood Financial LLC

Western District of WashingtonTerrell Marshall Law Group
Washington CEMA / CPA+1
View
Want to see who’s next?

0 predicted defendants are waiting in Rain Intelligence.

Be the first attorney to reach the next client in this trend. Rain Intelligence customers get the full list of investigations, AI-forecasted targets, and plaintiff-firm activity — delivered to their inbox before complaints are filed.

30+

AmLaw 200 firms

$200M+

Attorney fees generated

0

Enterprise cancellations